Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a's score of 78.8. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a somewhat heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than Google Pixel 3a. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2246. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a lower video definition, a tinier aperture and a worse resolution back-facing camera, they both have the same sensor size.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.