Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A51's global score of 85.5. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an older, thicker and just a little heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy A51. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A51, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246, a little bit smaller display and a bit lower pixel quantity in each inch in the screen. The Galaxy A51 features a better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A51, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A51 and Xiaomi Pocophone F1 count with quite similar batteries duration.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A51, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A51. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A51, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.