Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Despite of the fact the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is way older and thicker than vivo X70 Pro, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little bit better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2246px, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel quantity in each inch of display.
Vivo X70 Pro features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Vivo X70 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments, a way more MP back-facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos.
Vivo X70 Pro has a little better battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.