Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, having a score of 80.3 against 71.8. Google Nexus 6P's body is somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, although it's just a little bit heavier and was released about 16 months before. The Google Nexus 6P has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a little bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater pixels number per inch in the screen.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Google Nexus 6P's CPU is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's processing unit, both of them have 3 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with superior battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 19% bigger battery capacity. The Google Nexus 6P captures a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a camera with a lower 12.3 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.