Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, getting a 76.4 score against 71.8. Although Motorola Droid Turbo is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, it must be noted that it is also much older, noticeably thicker and just a little heavier. These devices use Android operating system, but Motorola Droid Turbo has an older 4.4.4 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a graphics processor. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a way better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Droid Turbo takes slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Motorola Droid Turbo is more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.