Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic indigo |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 145.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, with a 79.7 score against 71.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Moto G Stylus has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Moto G Stylus's construction is incredibly newer, but a little bit thicker and heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a screen that is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's display, because although the Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little lower display density, it also counts with a larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2300 resolution. The Moto G Stylus's CPU is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's CPU, and although the Moto G Stylus has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Moto G Stylus takes greater photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a bit superior battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Moto G Stylus, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.