Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than Google Nexus 6P, having a general score of 81.1 against 80.3. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Google Nexus 6P. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Nexus 6P has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures, a larger diafragm aperture for better images in poorly lited environments and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 46% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.