Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-30 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the ZTE Axon 11, with a score of 85.5 against 76. Even being the best phone we compare here, it must be noted that it's also an older, a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit faster processing unit than ZTE Axon 11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little sharper display than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2246 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels number in each inch of screen. The ZTE Axon 11 has slightly more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures clearer videos and photos than ZTE Axon 11, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, they both have a F1.9 camera aperture. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and ZTE Axon 11 feature very similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.