Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-06-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a 78.1 score against 77.8. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a noticeably older and notably thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but ZTE managed to make it lighter anyway. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has the older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a larger display, a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a just a bit better pixel amount in each inch in the display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography, a worse video quality and a camera in the back with way less MP resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.