Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, getting a overall score of 85.5 against 78.1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is a little lighter than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it is thicker and was released 3 years before. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra and Xiaomi Pocophone F1 feature incredibly similar processors, both have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2246 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a way higher video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.