Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-20 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, with a score of 84.9 against 81. The iPhone 11 Pro body has the same weight than Galaxy C9 Pro, but it's somewhat thicker. IPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy C9 Pro works with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS. IPhone 11 Pro features a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone 11 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a higher count of pixels per screen inch. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro takes better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with superior battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3046mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.