Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 3.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50, getting an 85 score against 81.2. Although iPhone 8 is noticeably older than Motorola Edge 50, it's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner. The Motorola Edge 50 features a more vivid display than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a lot better 1220 x 2712px resolution, a higher pixel density, way more screen brightness and a lot bigger screen.
The iPhone 8 features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Motorola Edge 50 counts with as much memory for apps and games as the Apple iPhone 8, both of them have the same internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way better battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 features a better camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.