Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-09-22 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a global score of 85, which is just a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's global score of 81. Even though iPhone 8 and the Galaxy C9 Pro were released with only a few months difference, iPhone 8's design is just a little thicker but a lot lighter than the Galaxy C9 Pro. IPhone 8 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a just a bit inferior pixels count in each display inch, a much smaller screen and a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution.
Apple iPhone 8 features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The iPhone 8 has a greater hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has less processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Galaxy C9 Pro has a much longer battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Apple iPhone 8 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.