Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-09-22 | -- |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 3.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, having an 85 score against 81.5. The iPhone 8 features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a way smaller display, way less pixels per screen inch and a much lower 750 x 1334px resolution. IPhone 8 features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The iPhone 8 has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has less cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra has a way better camera than iPhone 8, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.