Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 85 score against 77.8. Although the Apple iPhone 8 is a lot older and a lot thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still noticeably lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking display than iPhone 8, because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a really brighter display, a greater display density and a much larger display.
The iPhone 8 counts with a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 2 less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a much larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger aperture for better captures in low-light situations and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 8, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 213% greater battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, iPhone 8 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.