Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2022-03-18 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2022) is a bit better than Google Pixel XL, with an 86.6 score against 81.3. IPhone SE (2022)'s body is extremely newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Google Pixel XL. The Google Pixel XL features a bit better screen than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a lot better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, a lot greater pixels amount per inch of display and a larger screen.
The iPhone SE (2022) features a superior processing power than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone SE (2022) also has a greater number of cores and a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone SE (2022) takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
The Google Pixel XL counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 64 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel XL counts with a really longer battery performance than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity against 2018mAh.
IPhone SE (2022) is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.