Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-03-18 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, having an 86.6 score against 81. IPhone SE (2022) works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow operating system. IPhone SE (2022)'s body is much newer and way lighter than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it's just a little bit thicker.
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has lesser CPU cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334px, a lot smaller display and a bit lower display pixels density.
IPhone SE (2022) takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a way better (4K) video quality. Galaxy C9 Pro features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a really longer battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 98% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.