Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| iOS 15.x | Android 14 |
| 2022-03-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.62 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a score of 86.6, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) has iOS 15.x operating system, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro comes with Android 14 operating system. Despite of the fact Apple iPhone SE (2022) is incredibly older and notably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still extremely lighter.
Apple iPhone SE (2022) features a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 12 GB less RAM and lesser cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking screen than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a way bigger screen, way more screen brightness and a higher pixels density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery duration than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 182 percent greater battery size.
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.