Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-11-02 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 general score. Galaxy C9 Pro is a newer and a bit thinner phone than Google Nexus 6P, although it's also just a little heavier. Google Nexus 6P features a better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater screen density.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's processing unit is very similar to the CPU in Google Nexus 6P, and although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 3 GB more RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Google Nexus 6P takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12.3 MP resolution and a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a little bit better memory for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.