Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is better than the vivo X70 Pro's general score of 78.3. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G is older and just a little bit thicker than vivo X70 Pro, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The vivo X70 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little better pixels number per inch in the screen.
The vivo X70 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same video quality, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much larger camera sensor and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal storage. Vivo X70 Pro has a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.