Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50's overall score of 81.2. Although Google Pixel XL is notably older and a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 50, it's design is still a little lighter. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a bit lower 1220 x 2712 resolution and a little bit lower pixel quantity in each inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Google Pixel XL has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM. Motorola Edge 50 has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way more MP back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 45% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.