Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than Google Pixel XL, with an 84.7 score against 81.3. Even though the Galaxy A32 is notably newer than the Google Pixel XL, it's a little bit thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel XL has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixels density and a lot better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has more cores.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A32 captures better videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back camera with lot more megapixels and a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.