Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has an overall score of 84.9, which is a bit better than Google Pixel XL's 81.3 score. The Samsung Galaxy A80 design is much newer than Google Pixel XL's, although it's just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier. Galaxy A80 has a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more cpu cores and more RAM.
Google Pixel XL features just a bit better display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Galaxy A80 counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A80 also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A80's storage capacity for apps and games is just as good as the Google Pixel XL one, both have equal internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A80 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.