Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-10-20 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has an overall score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. The Google Pixel XL body is incredibly thicker but lighter than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and both of them were released only 4 months apart. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel XL features a much better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy C9 Pro features just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 256 GB.
Google Pixel XL has a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture and a back facing camera with a way worse 12.3 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Galaxy C9 Pro has a little better battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.