Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is better than Honor 9X Pro, having a score of 81.3 against 71.9. Even though the Google Pixel XL is incredibly older than Honor 9X Pro, it's body is lighter and a little thinner. The Honor 9X Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
Google Pixel XL features a little bit better looking display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Honor 9X Pro features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Honor 9X Pro features a superior camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Honor 9X Pro also has a larger back camera sensor, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a back camera with a way better resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.