Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s has a score of 88, which is much better than the Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 overall score. The Galaxy M31s body is just a little bit thicker but a little lighter than Honor 9X Pro, and both were released only 4 months apart. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy M31s has the newer 11 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version, so it offers some additional features and improved performance.
Samsung Galaxy M31s features a little bit better looking display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels in each display inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Honor 9X Pro has a much better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB, the Honor 9X Pro also has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy M31s counts with a bit superior processing unit than Honor 9X Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy M31s counts with a way better battery life than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. The Galaxy M31s counts with just a bit better camera than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M31s also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.