Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-21 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 is a little bit better than LG V30, with a 79.8 score against 79.1. The Moto Z4 is a a bit heavier cellphone than LG V30, but both are 0.29inches thick. LG V30 features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z4. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Moto Z4 has a much better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto Z4 also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting way higher quality photos and a camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution.
The LG V30 has just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z4, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z4 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 9% greater battery capacity.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V30. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Moto Z4, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG V30, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.