Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is better than vivo X70 Pro's overall score of 78.3. The LG Velvet construction has the same thickness than the vivo X70 Pro, but it's a little bit lighter. The vivo X70 Pro and LG Velvet both count with extremely similar screens, and although the vivo X70 Pro has a little bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution and a quite smaller display, they both have the same display pixels density.
LG Velvet counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh. The vivo X70 Pro features a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a better resolution camera, a much larger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.