Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 14 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Motorola Edge 50's construction is lighter but way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and they were released with only 4 months difference.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with much more brightness, a bigger screen and a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.