Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is a bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, with a global score of 84.5 against 79.7. The Apple iPhone XS Max is an older and just a little heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but Apple was able to build it thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone XS Max features a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a quite greater display pixel density, a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution and a bit larger display.
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a superior hardware performance than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality photos, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Moto G Stylus has superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G Stylus. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G Stylus, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.