Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A12 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, having a overall score of 80.3 against 79.7. Even though the Galaxy A12 and Motorola Moto G Stylus were only released with a couple of months difference, Galaxy A12's construction is just a bit heavier but also just a bit thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A12 has 10 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
Moto G Stylus counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2300 pixels resolution and a better count of pixels per display inch. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A12 features a bit faster processor than Moto G Stylus. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Moto G Stylus takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 MP resolution, the Moto G Stylus also has a way better (4K) video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos.
The Galaxy A12 features greater battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.