Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, having an 87.1 score against 79.7. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Note9 is older and just a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, it's design is still just a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a better 1440 x 2960px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has as much memory to install applications and games as Moto G Stylus, both have equal internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note9 has a battery lifetime that's very similar to Motorola Moto G Stylus's battery lifetime. Motorola Moto G Stylus takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy Note9 is way more expensive than Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.