Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Despite of the fact Motorola Moto G Stylus is extremely older and noticeably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still somewhat lighter. These devices work with Android OS, but Motorola Moto G Stylus has older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Moto G Stylus has a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a larger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a better resolution back facing camera.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Moto G Stylus is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.