Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, with a overall score of 79.7 against 78.8. Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola Moto G Stylus is an older, somewhat thicker and a little heavier phone than the vivo X60 Pro. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide very similar operating system features.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2376 resolution. The vivo X60 Pro features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro captures a bit better videos and photos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photographs and video in low light situations, and they both have a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, a back camera with a 48 megapixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with faster video frame rates.
Moto G Stylus has a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Vivo X60 Pro features a bit longer battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.