Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.09 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is better than the Moto G73 5G's 73.8 global score. Galaxy Note9 has a much more powerful processor than Moto G73 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Note9 has a brighter display than Moto G73 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher screen pixels density.
Motorola Moto G73 5G takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G73 5G also counts with a much more MP back facing camera.
The Galaxy Note9 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G73 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G73 5G features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.