Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-10-04 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than Moto Z Play's global score of 74.4. The iPhone SE (2022) is a a lot newer and somewhat lighter phone than Moto Z Play, although it's a little bit thicker. IPhone SE (2022) has iOS 15.x operating system, and Moto Z Play works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, although it has a little bit worse pixels amount per inch in the display, a lot worse 750 x 1334 resolution and a little bit smaller screen. The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a more powerful processing unit than Moto Z Play, because although it has 2 less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64 bits processing unit.
The Moto Z Play has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Play has a really longer battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 74% larger battery capacity.
IPhone SE (2022) has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Apple iPhone SE (2022) is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.