Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s has a global score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than Moto Z4's overall score of 79.8. Galaxy M30s's body is heavier and somewhat thicker than the Moto Z4. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M30s has 11 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10.
Galaxy M30s has a little better performance than Moto Z4. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto Z4. They have a better number of pixels per inch of display, a display with the same size and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Motorola Moto Z4 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, the same resolution camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments.
Moto Z4 has a very superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Moto Z4 also has 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy M30s features a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.