Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting an 87 score against 78.3. The Motorola razr (2020) construction has the same thickness than the vivo X70 Pro, but it is just a little bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should count with identical OS features.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM. Vivo X70 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little larger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little better pixels density.
Vivo X70 Pro has a slightly better camera than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has faster video frame rates, a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a more MP camera. Vivo X70 Pro's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Motorola razr (2020)'s one, both have equal internal memory.
Vivo X70 Pro features a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4450mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.