Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is much better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, having a global score of 87.1 against 73.1. Galaxy Note9 features a lot better performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a brighter display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Note9 features a slightly bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy Note9 takes a lot better photos and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. They have a same resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.