Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| -- | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 426 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's general score of 73.1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a more vivid display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit worse 1080 x 2246 resolution and a little bit smaller display.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. They have a back camera with a 12 megapixels. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.