Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, with a overall score of 91.8 against 71.5. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
Galaxy A71 5G features just a little better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a quite bigger display, a little bit better pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a lot better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have a same resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.