Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 score. The Galaxy A80 design is thicker and a little heavier than the OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution, a quite higher display pixels density and a bit bigger display.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A80 and OSCAL Tiger 12 feature quite similar processing units, both have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a way better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way less mega pixels camera in the back. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy A80, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.