Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a just a little lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit larger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bit better pixels amount per inch of display.
Galaxy C9 Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot lower 16 mega-pixels resolution camera. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.