Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having an 86.5 score against 71.5. The Galaxy M31 is a just a little lighter but just a bit thicker phone than OSCAL Tiger 12. These devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy M31 has the older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Galaxy M31 counts with a little bit better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a quite inferior pixel count per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a quite larger display and much more brightness. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy M31, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy M31 has greater battery duration than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh. Galaxy M31 captures greater pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have a back-facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.