Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a general score of 88 against 71.5. Samsung Galaxy M31s is a thicker and a little bit heavier phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M31s has the previous 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a lot better display than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a little larger screen. Galaxy M31s counts with a bit better CPU than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with longer battery performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy M31s counts with a way better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have the same resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.