Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having an 85.5 score against 71.5. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a just a bit lighter but just a little thicker phone than OSCAL Tiger 12. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a little bit bigger display and a really brighter display.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better processor than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 768 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.