Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a score of 80.3, which is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus's 79.7 global score. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A12 has 10 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy A12's design is a little thinner but just a little bit heavier than Moto G Stylus, and both of them were released with only a couple of months difference.
Moto G Stylus features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2300 and a better screen density. Motorola Moto G Stylus has a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A12, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A12 has a little faster processor than Moto G Stylus. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Moto G Stylus takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a 48 megapixels camera in the back, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A12 counts with longer battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.