Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is a bit better than the Galaxy A12, having an 84.9 score against 80.3. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy A80 is an older, a bit heavier and a bit thicker phone than Galaxy A12. The Galaxy A80 and Samsung Galaxy A12 have incredibly similar processors, and although the Galaxy A80 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A80 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A12, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a better number of pixels per inch of display and a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A12 counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 35 percent larger battery size. Galaxy A80 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A80 also has a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.