Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's general score of 78.3. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A31 has 10 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version. Despite being the best phone we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A31 is an older, a little bit thicker and just a little heavier phone than the vivo X70 Pro.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy A31 count with quite similar displays, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display and a bit worse 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Vivo X70 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a way better (4K) video definition, a larger aperture to capture better low light images, a lot bigger back camera sensor and a more mega pixels camera. The vivo X70 Pro features more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A31 features a bit superior battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.