Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A32, having a general score of 85 against 84.7. The iPhone 8 is an older phone than the Galaxy A32, but Apple made it noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner. The iPhone 8 features a more powerful processor than Galaxy A32, because although it has lesser CPU cores (although they are faster) and 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone 8 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little worse 750 x 1334 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The iPhone 8 features a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A32 counts with a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.